A simple redesign
Quick enough to review and iterate.
The practical AI field guide / 01
Claude’s effort levels, explained simply. When to turn the dial up, when to turn it down, and why more isn’t always better.
Find the right level ↗More work can help.
Unnecessary work can wait.
Same builder. Same instructions. A different amount of time and room to work.
For a simple house, you want something you can see, react to, and change together. Low effort can be a great fit.
For a complicated castle, the builder may need to test the structure and investigate weak spots. More effort has a purpose.
In one simple website redesign, the extra time barely changed the outcome.
A simple redesign
Quick enough to review and iterate.
A nearly identical result
More time doesn’t guarantee more value.
One anecdotal example from a video walkthrough, not an Anthropic benchmark or a prediction of your results. Bars compare elapsed time in that example only.
Choose the lowest effort that reliably delivers the quality you need.
Use this as a working-style analogy. Move the slider to explore all five levels.
A balanced starting point for clearly defined, everyday work. Give Claude a concrete task and enough context, then review the result.
This line illustrates a collaboration style, not guaranteed behaviour. Effort is not a permission or autonomy setting. Say explicitly when Claude should ask you, and what it may change.
Practical starting points for websites, applications, and integrations. Adjust for your model and the results you observe.
| What you’re doing | Try | Why it fits |
|---|---|---|
| Change headings, colours, or spacing | Low | Small, clear, and easy to review |
| Work together on a website design | Low | Fast feedback helps you steer |
| Build a component with clear requirements | Medium | Several steps with a defined outcome |
| Connect a CMS to an existing site | Medium | Raise it if the integration gets tricky |
| Debug a Cloudflare Worker or API | High | Investigation and edge cases matter |
| Check an order or payment integration | High | A hidden error can be expensive |
| Migrate a large WordPress site to Astro | XHigh | Many dependencies to work through |
| Investigate a particularly difficult problem | Max, selectively | Use when the extra work proves useful |
These are workflow suggestions, not universal model defaults. Available levels and recommended starting points vary by model.
You don’t need the same effort for the first draft, the final checks, and every spacing tweak.
Get a first version. React to the layout and copy.
Connect forms, routes, content, and functionality.
Review errors, accessibility, and edge cases.
Adjust headings, colours, and spacing.
Cache behaviour depends on the model and how effort is changed. Supported per-message changes can preserve the API prompt cache; changing the top-level setting can invalidate it. See the official documentation before relying on savings.
A quick recommendation based on your workflow. Choose the one that best describes your task.
A balanced place to start for everyday work with clear requirements.
Choose your main priority. This tool is a practical heuristic; your model’s guidance and measured results come first.
In Claude Code, type /effort to open a slider, or add a level to set it directly, like /effort high. Which levels you get, and the default, depend on your model.
/effortState the outcome, constraints, and checks you need. More effort won’t fill in every missing requirement.
Try it for simple changes and quick collaboration. Give multi-part tasks an explicit checklist.
A task can be small and still deserve careful verification when a mistake would matter.
THE LATHAM is my weekly newsletter: what I’m building with AI, what’s working, and what the human still has to do.